Search for: ""Georgia v. Randolph" OR "547 U.S. 103"" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2014, 5:36 am by Bob Farb
Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006): the validity of a consent search by a residential occupant after a co-occupant has previously objected to a search but is no longer physically present […] [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 9:05 pm
Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), the lower court erred in holding that the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule would allow admission of the seized evidence. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:21 am
RANDOLPH, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THE INEVITABLE DISCOVERY EXCEPTION TO THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE WOULD ALLOW ADMISSION OF THE SEIZED EVIDENCE.NMCCA's en banc opinion is published at 66 M.J. 544.The second case is United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:49 pm
Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), which held that where one occupant consents to the search but the other objects, the search is unreasonable as to the objector. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:17 am by Brandon W. Barnett
The CCA cited the reasoning of the Supreme Court in the case of Georgia v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:07 am
Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 126 (2006) (Breyer, J., concurring) (discussing instances of domestic abuse); see also United States v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 6:58 am
Randolph (2006), 547 U.S. 103, 110, 126 S.Ct. 1515, 164 L.Ed.2d 208 (stating that "Fourth Amendment rights are not limited by the law of property. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 3:27 pm
RANDOLPH, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), seeking reversal of an unpublished Judge Mathews the Great decision, United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:46 pm
Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), characterizing the OSI agents' conduct as "disturbing. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 6:08 am
Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 120 (2006) (holding that "a warrantless search of a shared dwelling for evidence over the express refusal of consent by a physically present resident cannot be justified as reasonable as to him on the basis of consent given to the police by another resident") (emphasis added); see also Randolph, 547 U.S. at 126 (Breyer, J., concurring) ("The Court's opinion does not apply where the objector is… [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:31 am
Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), the U.S. [read post]