Search for: ""Griggs v. Duke Power Co." OR "401 U.S. 424"" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 12:31 pm by MorelliRatner
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), which explained the centrality of the disparate-impact concept to effective enforcement of Title VII.read more [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:49 pm by Greensboro Legal Blog
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, 91 S.Ct. 849, 28 L.Ed.2d 158 (1971) and Albemarle Paper Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 5:33 pm
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, 431.The DOJ did not allege the city's motives were discriminatory; only that the standardized test--while neutral on its face--resulted in the rejection of a disproportionate number of African Americans. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 5:29 am
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) In a race discrimination case, the Supreme Court used "disparate impact" theory to analyze employment discrimination under Title VII. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:03 pm by David Conforto
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), the Supreme Court case that first held disparate impact discrimination to be illegal provides a good illustration of disparate impact litigation. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm by Pamela Wolf
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424, ruled that a high school diploma requirement was discriminatory due to its disparate impact on African-Americans and because it was not job-related and consistent with a business necessity. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:03 pm
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), the Supreme Court case that first held disparate impact discrimination to be illegal provides a good illustration of disparate impact litigation. [read post]
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), held that Title VII’s disparate impact section, which, at the time, was identical to the current ADEA language, extended to both employees and job applicants. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:00 pm by Greg Mersol
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), and its progeny, is that such rules may have a disparate impact against minorities. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Duke Power Co. (401 U.S. 424, 1970), in which a unanimous Court held that when an employment practice operates to exclude African-Americans or other racial minorities, that practice is prohibited unless the employer can show that it fulfills a genuine business need and is a valid measure of an applicant’s ability to learn or perform the job in question. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), which strongly suggest that § 703(a)(2), the provision in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. [read post]