Search for: ""Hamdi v. Rumsfeld" OR "542 U.S. 507"" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2014, 3:30 am by Mark Kende
Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), for example, the U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:34 am by Benjamin Wittes
Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 535 (2004), and explicitly contemplated the admission of “[h]earsay … as the most reliable evidence” available in some cases, id. at 534–35. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:12 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 519 (2004) (plurality opinion); AI-Bihani v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 10:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 518 (2004), that the AUMF implicitly authorizes certain military detentions does not govern the instant case because the ruling in Hamdi applies only to the military detention of persons taken prisoner on a foreign battlefield, inside a zone of active combat. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:35 pm
Rumsfeld (542 U.S. 507 (2004)), as did Judge Michael Mukasey in Padilla ex rel. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Over the last few weeks, Congress and the White House have been circling one another, angling for that final bit of leverage that will define whether President Obama does or does not get to fulfill his first-week-in-office pledge to shutter the Guantanamo Bay detention facility. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 10:51 am by Benjamin Wittes
542 U.S. 507, 534 (2004). [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:13 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004); el se le debe otorgar el derecho a los detenidos en Guantánamo a impugnar su detención a pesar del país estar en guerra en Boumediene v. [read post]