Search for: ""Heck v. Humphrey" OR "512 U.S. 477"" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2021, 8:31 am by snahmod
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), which governs […] [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:55 am by snahmod
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), that applies where the section 1983 plaintiff has a prior conviction whose validity might be implicated by a successful section 1983 damages action. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 9:19 am by snahmod
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), where the plaintiff has a prior conviction […] [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), "Shapard’s version of the facts 'clearly impl[ies] the invalidity of his assault conviction, which has not been set aside, and consequently [his claims] arebarred by Heck[.] [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:39 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), that a Section 1983 lawsuit must be dismissed if its success would necessarily undercut the legitimacy of the plaintiff's criminal conviction, unless that conviction was reversed on appeal or called into question by a federal habeas corpus ruling. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:28 am
Humphrey and the Full Faith and Credit statute. 512 U.S. 477, 484 (1994); 28 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:41 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit issued a rare en banc decision interpreting the Supreme Court's ruling in Heck v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:38 pm by A. Benjamin Spencer
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), which generally prohibits an individual from recovering damages in a civil rights action for an allegedly unlawful confinement where there has not been a favorable termination of the criminal action on appeal or in a collateral action. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:08 am
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), because each necessarily implies the invalidity of Johnson's sentence. . . . [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 12:37 pm
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), applies and bars certain claims, while others are barred by absolute judicial immunity. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 7:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), which holds that Section 1983 claims cannot proceed if they would necessarily undermine a parallel criminal conviction, such that, in the most obvious case, someone convicted in criminal court cannot claim the underlying arrest lacked probable case. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:27 am
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) bars defendant's claim because his assertion that he did not oppose being taken into custody contradicts his conviction for resisting arrest is reversed as, Wallace v. [read post]