Search for: ""Holmes v. South Carolina" OR "547 U.S. 319"" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2009, 6:21 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The Court applied the test it previously employed in People v Young (7 NY3d 40 [2006]) for determining whether such a ruling is error: was there was evidence which corroborated the identification evidence.The Young standard in which a defendant’s right to present evidence is conditioned on the court’s perception of the strength of the People’s case appears to be in conflict with the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Holmes v South… [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 10:13 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
South Carolina547 U.S. 319, 327, 126 S.Ct. 1727, 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006). [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:26 am by Jonathan Holbrook
South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006) (“the Constitution guarantees criminal defendants a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense”); Gardner v. [read post]