Search for: ""IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez" OR "546 U.S. 21"" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Proposed USDA Regulation Requires Slaughter Facilities To Pay Overtime For Inspector Donning And Doffing
18 Aug 2010, 6:39 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  The FSIS claims that the amendment is necessary to achieve compliance with the Supreme Court’s decision in IBP, Inc. v. [read post]
Hunton Employment & Labor Law Perspectives - http://www.huntonlaborblog.com/
CAFC affirms PTAB in Credit Acceptance case
9 Jun 2017, 12:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Alvarez, 546 U.S. 21, 34(2005). [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Time Spent Booting Up Computers May Be Compensable, According to Unanimous 9th Circuit Continue Reading…
7 Nov 2022, 10:09 am by <a href='http://www.ebglaw.com/adriana-s-kosovych/'>Adriana S. Kosovych</a> and <a href='https://www.ebglaw.com/people/alexandria-k-adkins/'>Alexandria K. Adkins</a>
” IBP, Inc. v. [read post]
Wage & Hour Defense Blog - http://www.wagehourblog.com/
California Supreme Court limits employers use of the de minimis doctrine as defense in Starbucks’ decision
27 Jul 2018, 7:20 pm by Anthony Zaller
Alvarez, 546 U.S. 21, 25–26, 126 S.Ct. 514, 163 L.Ed.2d 288 (2005). [read post]
California Employment Law Report - http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/
California Supreme Court agrees to review Starbucks’ de minimis defense
19 Aug 2016, 11:36 am by Anthony Zaller
Alvarez, 546 U.S. 21, 25–26, 126 S.Ct. 514, 163 L.Ed.2d 288 (2005). 2. [read post]
California Employment Law Report - http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/
Are COVID-19 Temperature Screenings Compensable Time for Non-Exempt Employees? Continue Reading…
10 Jun 2020, 8:50 am by <a href='http://www.ebglaw.com/showbio.aspx?Show=2371'>Michael S. Kun</a>, <a href='http://www.ebglaw.com/jeffrey-h-ruzal/'>Jeffrey H. Ruzal</a> and <a href='https://www.ebglaw.com/carly-baratt/'>Carly Baratt</a>
Alvarez , 546 U.S. 21, 30 (2005). [2] 29 C.F.R. [read post]
Wage & Hour Defense Blog - http://www.wagehourblog.com/
6th Cir.: Although Changing Into PPE At Food-Processing Plant Is “Changing Clothes” and Excluded Under 203(o), It Is A Principle Activity And Begins The “Continuous Workday”
3 Sep 2010, 4:07 am by Andrew Frisch
See IBP, Inc., 546 U.S. at 37 (& [read post]
Overtime Law Blog | FLSA Decisions - http://overtimelaw.wordpress.com
FLSA Class Action Defense Cases-Spoerle v. Kraft Foods: Wisconsin Federal Court Denies Defense Summary Judgment Motion In FLSA Class Action Seeking Compensation For Donning And Doffing Protective Equipment
11 Feb 2008, 4:14 am
Alvarez, 546 U.S. 21 (2005), which also concerned the donning and doffing of protective gear for meat plant workers. [read post]
Class Action Defense Blog - http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/