Search for: ""INS v. St. Cyr" OR "533 U.S. 289""
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001) -- and thus didn't meet the higher standard for ineffective assistance in removal proceedings. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:49 am
Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001), where the Court determined that despite the fact that section 212(c) was repealed in 1996, the waiver remains available as a form of relief from removal to individuals who had been convicted by a plea agreement, and where at the time they entered their plea they would have been eligible for a 212(c) waiver. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 1:58 pm
Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001), a pre-9/11 decision. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 7:55 am
Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001), citing new regulations and the hardships he would suffer if deported back to the land (Cape Verde) that he had never known. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm
For example, look at U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:35 pm
Cyr (533 U.S. 289 (2001)), the Suspension Clause guarantees statutory habeas jurisdiction at least in all cases where the writ would have been available at common law). [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:39 am
Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 301 (2001). [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:40 pm
Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 312-13 (2001). [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]