Search for: ""Kastigar v. United States" OR "406 U.S. 441"" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Further, in Kastigar v United States, 406 U.S.441, the Supreme Court held that in the event an employee believes information obtained under threat of disciplinary action is going to be used against him or her in a pending criminal proceeding, he or she may request what is now referred to as a “Kastigar hearing” to determine whether the prosecution made any use of either a compelled, immunized statement or any… [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 1:32 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972). [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 8:54 am by Zachary Spilman
United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972), and determined that there was no impermissible use of immunized testimony. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:06 am by Michael Witsch
United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972), to dismiss the indictment or suppress Robson’s testimony. [read post]