Search for: ""Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez" OR "372 U.S. 144""
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2013, 3:30 pm
Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144, 167 (1963) (notice required under Sixth Amendment includes the right to indictment, a written statement of the charges). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:30 pm
Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144 (1963), and restated by the Court in Hudson. [read post]
3 May 2009, 10:17 pm
Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144, 168-69 (1963).In Wallace, the Indiana Supreme Court found only one factor – advancing a non-punitive interest – to point in favor of treating Indiana’s Sex Offender Registration Act as non-punitive. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 3:43 am
Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144 (1963): The factors most relevant to our analysis are whether, in its necessary operation, the regulatory scheme: [1] has been regarded in our history and traditions as a punishment; [2] imposes an affirmative disability or restraint; [3] promotes the traditional aims of punishment; [4] has a rational connection to a nonpunitive purpose; or [5] is excessive with respect to this purpose. [read post]
