Search for: ""Lawrence v. Texas" OR "539 U.S. 558"" Results 61 - 80 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2008, 10:24 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, ___ (2003) (Scalia, J., dissenting), citing Washington v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:23 am by Jessica Smith
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 578 (2003), which held that criminalizing consensual adult sodomy was unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:38 am by Glenn Cohen
Texas seems to subject the criminalization of sexually intimate activities to heightened constitutional scrutiny but that does not mean the state is subject to the same scrutiny if it criminalizes paying for those activities, or at least so suggests the Lawrence majority. 539 U.S. 558, 577-79 (2003).; but see id. 592, 603 (Scalia, J., Dissenting) (attacking this distinction). [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, which had declared that the Texas Homosexual Conduct Act violated the liberty interest of same-sex couples by imposing criminal penalties on private, adult consensual sexual activity. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:06 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), he couldn't have been guilty of sodomy. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 3:53 am by Gregory Forman
Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) gave legal protection to homosexual relationships, finding the state denies homosexuals equal protection when it criminalizes their consensual sexual activity. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:48 am by Gregory Forman
Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) which found it violated due process clause to criminalize homosexual sodomy. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:49 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), however, the same Court was willing in Martin to conclude that the fornication statute was irrational, and therefore unconstitutional. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), must satisfy an intermediate level of scrutiny under substantive due process; and 2) such inquiry requires facts not present on the record before the circuit court. . [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), the Justices were aware that two Texas state judges had declared the law an unconstitutional sex discrimination and that the Texas judiciary had immediately rebuked them. [read post]