Search for: ""Mapp v. Ohio" OR "367 U.S. 643""
Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2017, 10:02 pm by Hall
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), on application of the exclusionary rule to the states decided 56 years ago today. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:57 am by Lucie Olejnikova
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure case, and Texas v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:04 am by Bruce M. Robinson
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), says that citizens shall not be stopped in their cars, or otherwise without probable cause or reasonable suspicion to believe that a crime has been committed. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:45 pm by Theodore Harvatin
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)) This will often times leave the prosecutor without sufficient evidence to prove its case, resulting in dismissal of the charges. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:46 am by The Charge
Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83 (1980) (a case reaching the Court from Massachusetts) and created a state law rule of automatic standing for all possessory offenses in Commonwealth v. [read post]
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) (extending the exclusionary rule to the States under the 14th Amendment’s due process clause), and Wong Sun v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:33 am by Susan Brenner
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, that the Supreme Court applied the rule to state law enforcement officers, as well. [read post]