Search for: ""Marks v. United States" OR "430 U.S. 188"" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2013, 10:11 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977) -- now featuring Venn diagrams: Three judges issued separate opinions concurring in the D.C. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:47 am by Lawrence Solum
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977), which instructed that where the Justices fail to converge on a single majority rationale, “the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 12:24 pm
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977).Assuming that Marks also governs the way CAAF opinions should be construed--as at least one CAAF judge has assumed, see United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977). [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:56 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (U.S. 1977). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977) – that the controlling “holding of the court may be viewed as that position taken by those members who concurred on the narrowest grounds. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm by Don Cruse
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977)4 Notably, the Texas courts have not adopted the Marks reasoning as a way to resolve splits on the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977), which held that  “[w]hen a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here is the text of Section 5000A as it currently appears in the U.S. [read post]