Search for: ""Marks v. United States" OR "430 U.S. 188"" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977), a series of potential reforms are proposed. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 8:20 am by David Post
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977): Chief Justice Robert's vote was necessary in holding unconstitutional Louisiana's admitting-privileges law, so his separate opinion is controlling. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 8:54 am by Josh Blackman
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977) (explaining that when "no single rationale explaining the result [of a case] enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds'" (quoting Gregg v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977), which held that  “[w]hen a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977) – that the controlling “holding of the court may be viewed as that position taken by those members who concurred on the narrowest grounds. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here is the text of Section 5000A as it currently appears in the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm by Don Cruse
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977)4 Notably, the Texas courts have not adopted the Marks reasoning as a way to resolve splits on the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]