Search for: ""Miles v. Apex Marine Corp." OR "498 U.S. 19"" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Apex Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19 (1990], or any of this Court's other decisions interpreting the statute. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:11 am
APEX Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19, 111 S.Ct. 317, 112 L.Ed. 2d 275 (1990). [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:22 pm
Apex Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19, 32 (1990) (“We assume that Congress is aware of existing law when it passes legislation”).Here, it is undisputed that Laerdal met the prerequisites for § 1337(g)(1). [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
Apex Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19, 1991 AMC 1 (1990) to bar claims for punitive damages against vessel owners for the willful failure to pay maintenance and cure. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm by Frederick B. Goldsmith
Apex Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19 (1990), wrote: “It followed Miles‘s reasoning, noting that because the Jones Act limits recovery of punitive damages for actions brought under it, the same result must occur when a Jones Act claim and general maritime claim are joined in the same action. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
Apex Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19 (1990) where it recognized that statutory law had become primary, that Congress retained superior authority in admiralty matters, and admiralty courts should look to the relevant statutes for policy guidance. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:45 pm
Apex Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19, 32 (1990). [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
A supreme flouting of the military and industrial contexts can be found in DeVries v. [read post]