Search for: ""Minor v. Happersett" OR "88 U.S. 162"" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2008, 9:30 am
Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), in which the Supreme Court held against some woman named Minor, represented by a lawyer named Minor, that women are citizens, but have no constitutional right to vote.The Court reasoned: "Certainly, if the courts can consider any question settled, this is one. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 12:33 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Happersett (88 U.S. 162;  21 Wall. 162, 1874), the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the 14th Amendment did not give the right to vote to women. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 12:33 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Happersett (88 U.S. 162;  21 Wall. 162, 1874), the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the 14th Amendment did not give the right to vote to women. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Happersett (88 U.S. 162, 1875), upholding the states’ right to deny women the franchise. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Happersett (88 U.S. 162, 1875), upholding the states’ right to deny women the franchise. [read post]