Search for: ""Reiter v. Sonotone Corp." OR "442 U.S. 330"" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Court Opinion on Reading Precedents
19 May 2010, 1:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330, 341 (1979). [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://volokh.com
Expanded Standing, or "Back to Basics"? Flash Memory Direct Purchasers Found to Have Standing to Assert Walker Process Claims
29 Mar 2011, 4:14 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330 (1979), the Supreme Court held that consumers who pay more for goods are injured in their business or property under Section 4. [read post]
Antitrust Law Blog - http://www.antitrustlawblog.com/
In Apple v Epic, 9th Circuit Should Remember that Antitrust Forbids Enhancing, not Exercising, Market Power
1 Apr 2022, 11:14 am by Thom Lambert
Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330, 343 (1979), short-run harm to consumers is not sufficient to condemn a business practice under the Sherman Act. [read post]
Truth on the Market - http://truthonthemarket.com/
The FTC Tacks Into the Gale, Battening No Hatches: Part 1
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
 In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
Truth on the Market - http://truthonthemarket.com/
The Death of Ride-Through in Consumer Bankruptcy Chapter 7 Cases in Arizona
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
See Till v. [read post]
AZ Bankruptcy Blog - http://www.arizonabankruptcyblog.info/