Search for: ""Sibron v. New York" OR "392 U.S. 40""
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 1:17 pm
New York, 392 U.S. 40 (1968), with Spencer v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:59 pm
New York, 392 U.S. 40, 60-61 (1968) (holding that, although a state may develop its own search and seizure law, the state may not authorize police conduct that infringes Fourth Amendment rights). [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 5:47 am
New York, 392 U.S. 40, 64, 20 L. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:38 am
New York, 392 U.S. 40, 62 –63. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:55 pm
New York, 392 U.S. 40, 61, 88 S. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 8:01 am
New York, 392 U.S. 40, 65, 88 S. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
New York, 392 U.S. 40, 59-62 (1968). [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
"' Id. 392 U.S. 40, 55 (1968) (quoting Parker v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:08 am
New York, 392 U.S. 40 (1968), in which the parties tried to litigate a facial challenge to a stop-and-identify statute. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 6:47 am
New York, 392 U.S. 40, 64-65 (1968). [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:11 am
New York, 392 U.S. 40, 64 (1968). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:23 pm
New York, 388 U. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:49 am
New York, 392 U.S. 40, 61 (1968) ("The question in this Court upon review of a state-approved search or seizure is not whether the search (or seizure) was authorized by state law. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm
See D.B.A. v. [read post]
