Search for: ""Strickland v. Washington" OR "466 U.S. 668""
Results 1 - 20 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 7:46 am
Washington (466 U.S. 668); "The respondent, the Commissioner of Correction, appealed from the habeas court’s judgment, claiming that the habeas court, in determining that the prejudice prong of the Strickland test had been satisfied, failed to apply the correct legal standard and failed to properly weigh the totality of the evidence presented at the petitioner’s habeas and criminal trials. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:33 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), then the ruling could be applied retroactively to convictions entered prior to 2010. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:31 am by Jon Sands
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), because there was no Sixth Amendment duty to advise about the collateral consequences of a guilty plea. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm by Jon Sands
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), isn't clearly established federal law under 28 U.S.C. [read post]