Search for: ""Strickland v. Washington" OR "466 U.S. 668"" Results 1 - 20 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 7:46 am
Washington (466 U.S. 668); "The respondent, the Commissioner of Correction, appealed from the habeas court’s judgment, claiming that the habeas court, in determining that the prejudice prong of the Strickland test had been satisfied, failed to apply the correct legal standard and failed to properly weigh the totality of the evidence presented at the petitioner’s habeas and criminal trials. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 5:44 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), must take the State’s case as it was presented to the jury, as ten state and federal courts have held, or whether the court may instead hypothesize that the jury may have disbelieved the State’s case, as the Maryland Court of Appeals held below. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 8:51 pm by Jon Katz
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)); and (with court administration-related limits) the right to choose one's own paid attorney (U.S. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:54 am by Aurora Barnes
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) The post Petitions of the week appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:47 pm
Nixon, 543 U.S. 175, 187 (2004) (citing Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 5:43 pm by Frank Heft
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), the Sixth Circuit found that “existing precedent did not ‘clearly foreshadow’” Taylor. [read post]