Search for: ""The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co." OR "407 U.S. 1""
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2008, 4:23 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:40 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972), or under principles of fiduciary duty. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:24 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 12-15, 92 S. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
Bremen, 407 U.S. at 15. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 10-15, 92 S. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 10 (1972), the Supreme Court held that a forum-selection clause is “prima facie valid and should be enforced unless enforcement is shown by the resisting party to be ‘unreasonable’ under the circumstances. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:32 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972), held that the inconvenience of litigating in a foreign forum doesn't warrant setting aside a selection clause "where it can be said with reasonable assurance" that at the time the contract was made the parties contemplated the claimed inconvenience. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
Bremen, 407 U.S. at 15. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 10:21 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1) criticized such thinking in part because forum selection clauses often provide consistency and certainty. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:00 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972).The court also rejected the notion that Diamond Bermuda was engaged in an impermissible collateral attack on the Netherlands judgment, on the grounds that while in general a party cannot collaterally attack the merits of a foreign judgment, it can do so on one of the limited grounds in the UFCMJRA.Judge Frost dissented and raised what I think is a strong point. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 3:58 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 10 (1972). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 15, 92 S. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972), focusing on whether the clause was reasonably communicated to the party resisting enforcement; whether it was mandatory or permissive; whether the claims and parties are covered by the clause; and whether the presumption of enforceability was adequately rebutted (by making a strong showing that enforcement would “unreasonable or unjust, or that the clause was invalid for such reasons as… [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:58 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 10, 15 (1972). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972), as well as the pertinent Eleventh Circuit authority. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972).The court also rejected the notion that Diamond Bermuda was engaged in an impermissible collateral attack on the Netherlands judgment, on the grounds that while in general a party cannot collaterally attack the merits of a foreign judgment, it can do so on one of the limited grounds in the UFCMJRA.Judge Frost dissented and raised what I think is a strong point. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 15, 92 S. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 5:48 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 92 S.Ct. 1907, 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972). . . . [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:08 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972)], any disfavor Massachusetts harbors towards forum selection clauses—as manifested in the MNCA—does not weaken the presumption of enforceability that forum selection clauses enjoy in federal court. [read post]
