Search for: ""United States v. Booker" OR "543 U.S. 220"" Results 1 - 20 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2006, 12:26 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), to accord a presumption of reasonableness to within-Guidelines sentences? [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 4:48 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a sentencing court is still under no obligation to give notice before imposing a sentence in excess of the Chapter 7 sentence range.Read the opinion here. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), provided the opportunity for a wholesale re-examination of the federal sentencing scheme that had held judges, defendants and practitioners alike in thrall for some 17 years. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 1:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 246 (2005)(collecting cases). [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:00 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a district court abuses its discretion by declining to consider the disparity between a recommended Guidelines sentence and the maximum sentence a defendant would receive if convicted of the same conduct in state court. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 8:07 pm by Anthony Colleluori
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), to accord a presumption of reasonableness to within-Guidelines sentences? [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 9:07 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), that facts relevant to the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines need not be submitted to a jury. [read post]