Search for: ""United States v. Di Re" OR "332 U.S. 581"" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 5:39 am
Di Re, 332 U.S. 581, 594 (1948) (“One has an undoubted right to resist an unlawful arrest, and courts will uphold the right of resistance in proper cases. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:10 am by Jeff Welty
Di Re, 332 U.S. 581 (1948), for the proposition that probable cause to search a vehicle does not necessarily justify a search of its occupants, ruled that the search of the defendant was faulty because there was no evidence “that the marijuana odor was attributable to defendant”). [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:44 am by Orin Kerr
Di Re, 332 U.S. 581, 594 (1948) (“One has an undoubted right to resist an unlawful arrest, and courts will uphold the right of resistance in proper cases. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:10 am by Jeff Welty
Di Re, 332 U.S. 581 (1948), for the proposition that probable cause to search a vehicle does not necessarily justify a search of its occupants, ruled that the search of the defendant was faulty because there was no evidence “that the marijuana odor was attributable to defendant”). [read post]