Search for: ""Wickard v. Filburn" OR "317 U.S. 111""
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2011, 4:07 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 10:30 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 3:39 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 3:27 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). [read post]
5 May 2012, 7:49 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), is shaping up as the most important agricultural law case ever decided by the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:54 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), offers a novel perspective on global federalism and the fundamental nature of the state. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:57 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), offers a novel perspective on global federalism and the fundamental nature of the state. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:51 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), has been the subject of extensive discussion on Agricultural Law. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:55 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), has been the subject of extensive discussion on Agricultural Law, a sister site within the Jurisdynamics Network. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942) Crowell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), but that case and others to the same effect were wrongly decided, as I have argued in several articles:A defect in the ConstitutionMcCulloch ReduxDiagram of Necessary and Proper ClauseThe original meaning of "carrying into execution"What "commerce" meant to the FramersUnnecessary and ImproperWhat happened with Wickard? [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:04 am
Filburn 317 U.S. 111 (1942) has always been a thorn in the side of the Tea party/Federalist/Scalia/Thomas crowd). [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:58 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (U.S. 1942). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), which held that growing wheat on one's farm for personal use is not beyond the reach of the power of the federal government under the Commerce Clause. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), which held that growing wheat on one's farm for personal use is not beyond the reach of the power of the federal government under the Commerce Clause. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:32 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm
Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995) and Wickard v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 1:42 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, 120 (1942). [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:51 pm
So is Wickard v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), where the Supreme Court interpreted the Commerce Clause to give Congress the power to regulate activity that has a substantial effect on interstate commerce. [read post]
