Search for: "*/**miller v. Jones"
Results 1 - 20
of 450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2024, 1:38 am
Philip Jones, Ecclesiastical Law: Clergy Discipline and Confidentiality: Gadd v Peers. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:21 am
In Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane (2006), the Supreme Court articulated the principles of needs, compensation, and sharing as applied to both matrimonial and non-matrimonial assets. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
Jones, No. 1:11-cv-0718, 2013 WL 1164929, at *6 (E.D. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
The new Speaker of the House, Dave Jones, is still largely unknown. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 9:15 am
” Miller v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
Jones before the Supreme Court on behalf of the United States.) [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Miller v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
[As longtime LHB readers know, I post here the essays I research and write for my exam in American Legal History, which principally treats the years 1898 to 1962. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion, in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
Republicans on Thursday voted to kick out Jones and fellow Democrat Justin Pearson. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Panelists include: Cristina V. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012). 2132. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm
Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:50 am
As a reminder… ‘Obvious & gross’ In the case of Wachtel v Wachtel [1973], the issue of conduct was considered by the family court and further summarised by Lady Hale in Miller [2006] as follows:“[…] once the assets are seen as a pool, and the couple as equal partners, then it is only equitable to take their conduct into account if one has been very much more to blame than the other: in the famous words of Ormrod J in Wachtel v Wachtel… [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
Five Justices of the Court will hear the arguments and determine the question; Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Sales, Lord Stephens, Lady Rose. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
But see Miller v. [read post]
