Search for: "*jones v. U. S" Results 1 - 20 of 428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana Declines to Hold Jones Act Employer Liable and Vessel Unseaworthy
22 Dec 2020, 8:28 am by Michael Neuner
  The post U. [read post]
Admiralty & Maritime - https://mblb.com/admiralty-maritime/
U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana Declines to Hold Jones Act Employer Liable and Vessel Unseaworthy
22 Dec 2020, 8:28 am by Michael Neuner
  The post U. [read post]
Admiralty & Maritime - https://mblb.com/admiralty-maritime/
Presidential immunity Under Clinton v. Jones
20 Nov 2019, 10:01 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Jones Former Arkansas state employee Paula Jones filed suit against President Bill Clinton under 42 U. [read post]
Constitutional Law Reporter - https://constitutionallawreporter.com/
What U.S. v. Jones
20 Jul 2012, 11:11 am by P.J. Blount
Jones, 132 S. [read post]
Res Communis - http://rescommunis.olemiss.edu/
Jones v. Harris Decided
30 Mar 2010, 10:06 am by Steve Bainbridge
The Supreme Court today issued a unanimous decision in Jones v. [read post]
ProfessorBainbridge.com - http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/
AMANDA R. JONES v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC.
2 Aug 2019, 7:25 am by Daily Record Staff
Despite that seemingly clear release, Jones has now sued Toyota Motor Sales alleging that ... [read post]
On the Record - http://thedailyrecord.com/ontherecord/
Theoretical Implications of a Supreme Court Ruling in Jones v. Harris.
12 Mar 2009, 7:46 pm
And now, to conclude, a few thoughts on the theoretical implications of a Supreme Court ruling in Jones v. [read post]
Conglomerate - http://www.theconglomerate.org/
U.S. Fifth Circuit Clarifies Seaman’s Standard of Care Under the Jones Act
31 Dec 2020, 11:12 am by Joe Trytten
Fifth Circuit Court’s Opinion clarifies area of contention under the Jones Act The U.S. [read post]
Admiralty & Maritime - https://mblb.com/admiralty-maritime/
Government’s Use of GPS Tracking Device to Monitor Vehicle for 28 Days Violates Fourth Amendment: United States v. Jones, No. 10-1259
24 Jan 2012, 7:44 am by Donna Eng
S. 276, 281 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
Florida Criminal Appeals Attorney Law - http://appealattorneylaw.com/
U.S. Fifth Circuit Clarifies Seaman’s Standard of Care Under the Jones Act
31 Dec 2020, 11:12 am by Joe Trytten
Fifth Circuit Court’s Opinion clarifies area of contention under the Jones Act The U.S. [read post]
Admiralty & Maritime - https://mblb.com/admiralty-maritime/
The Use of Trespass in U.S. v. Jones
23 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm by P.J. Blount
As with Entick, the case of U.S. v. [read post]
Res Communis - http://rescommunis.olemiss.edu/
U.S. 5th Circuit Highlights Chasm Between Seaman Classification Under Jones Act and FLSA
20 Jun 2017, 7:55 am by Steven Boutwell
By Zoe Vermeulen In the recent case of Halle v. [read post]
Louisiana Law Blog - http://www.louisianalawblog.com/
Carpenter v. United States, Docket 16-402
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
Jones, 565 U. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
Heartbreaker: U. S. Supreme Court Denies Falls Church Petition
10 Mar 2014, 7:12 am
Under its rules, the Court grants certiorari when at least four of the nine justices are interested in a given case; it takes five justices to make a majority.This was potentially a huge decision for those suffering from years of the courts' misreading of Jones v. [read post]
Anglican Curmudgeonr - http://accurmudgeon.blogspot.com/
SCOTUS Issues Pleadings Decision in Jones v. Bock
22 Jan 2007, 12:18 pm
Today the Supreme Court issued a decision in Jones v. [read post]
Federal Civil Practice Bulletin - http://federalcivilpracticebulletin.blogspot.com/
U. S. Supreme Court Unanimously Rule that GPS Installation and Tracking of a Vehicle Constitutes a Search, But The Justices Disagree on Rationale - Are Lines Being Drawn on Privacy Rights and New Technology?
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm by Jeff Neuburger
S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
New Media & Technology Law Blog - http://newmedialaw.proskauer.com
By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court holds that a federal prisoner who has already filed (and exhausted) a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 can’t file another postconviction motion to raise a claim of legal innocence based on an intervening statutory-interpretation-decision of  the Supreme Court.  Section 2255(h) bars second or successive 2255 motions based on non-constitutional claims; and the “saving clause” of § 2255(e) doesn’t authorize a petition for a “writ of habeas corpus,” under § 2241, for claims barred by § 2255(h). Jones v. Hendrix, Sup. Ct.  21-857, __U.S.. __  (June 22, 2023).
27 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm by Darrell Fields
Jones v. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
What Jones Does Not Hold
23 Jan 2012, 9:50 am by Orin Kerr
Mercury Marine, 537 U. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://volokh.com
U.S. Supreme Court, Dutra Group v. Batterton, Docket No. 18-266
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
The Jones Act provides injured seamen with a cause of action and a right to a jury. 46 U. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
U.S. Supreme Court: Jones v. Bock
23 Jan 2007, 6:12 am
. Jones v. [read post]
New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library - http://crimlawlib.blogspot.com/