Search for: "*long v. Lynaugh"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2015, 10:32 am
Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989).I sure hope that a long-overdue execution is not being held up while the Supreme Court tinkers yet again with an old decision that was wrong in the first place.Update: Michael Graczyk has this story for AP.Update 2: For the reasons why Penry was wrongly decided, see Justice Thomas's concurring opinion in Graham v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 1:31 pm
Lynaugh.) [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:57 am
Lynaugh, 492 U. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
Lynaugh and Penry v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Lynaugh and Penry v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:35 pm
Lynaugh, and subsequently, in Penry v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Frank v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 10:30 am
Lynaugh. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:57 pm
Lynaugh, via Oyez. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:10 am
Lynaugh, 492 U. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Fox v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
In Hurst v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:30 am
Quarterman, for instance, Justice Stevens wrote for the Court, reaffirming the long line of cases following Penry v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Texas, 14-292, involving a quadruple homicide from so long ago that people still thought I had promise. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989) gave Lockett a broad reading, but Johnson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am
The first, Atkins v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
But so long as most such decisions moved the law in a progressive direction, legal elites mostly bit their tongues. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:20 am
Although it had long "'look[ed] through' summary decisions by state appellate courts," the Eleventh Circuit believed that a recent decision of this Court--Harrington v. [read post]
