Search for: "*public Interest v. Bd. of Governors" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2011, 10:37 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Gloucester County Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, 409 N.J. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:14 pm by John Ponder and Whitney Hodges
”  The Superior Court of Sacramento held that as a matter of law, the Governor is not a “public agency” for CEQA purposes. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:14 pm by John Ponder and Whitney Hodges
”  The Superior Court of Sacramento held that as a matter of law, the Governor is not a “public agency” for CEQA purposes. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
The Supreme Court has recently generally emphasized that “common sense” is relevant at all levels of CEQA review, and observed in significant dicta that public interest standing is not “automatic,” but, rather, an exception to the normal beneficial interest standing requirement and subject to public policy limits.  [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:55 pm by Joy Waltemath
Detroit Bd. of Educ., in which a group of public-school teachers challenged a Michigan law establishing an exclusive representation scheme that authorized agency shop clauses in collective bargaining agreements between public-sector employers and unions. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 4:05 am
” The court explained that when the speaker is a government employee, the public employer may restrict speech that “does not relate to matters of public concern as long as the employee’s interest in speaking does not outweigh the government’s interest in prohibiting him or her from doing so” under Pickering v. [read post]
The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”) has spent five years drafting a comprehensive update to 30 sections of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines.[1] The updated text[2] (“Final Text”) ensures the Guidelines are consistent with recent court decisions, implements legislative changes, clarifies rules governing the CEQA process, and eliminates duplicative analysis. [read post]