Search for: "*u. S. v. Webster" Results 61 - 80 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Mortimer spray-painted the words "Dots U Smell" on the garage door of the house and also damaged two storm windows. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
We then address defendant's contention that the trial court should have granted his demurrer.State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 10:50 pm by Steve Baird
As many anxiously await the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (TTAB) decision in Blackhorse v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am by Pace Law Library
Understanding CERCLA through Webster's New World Dictionary and state common law: forestalling the federalization of property law. 44 New Eng. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
From today's Eleventh Circuit decision in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Matthew Waxman
The combined cases—referred to collectively as Arver v. [read post]
App. 855, 4 41037-1-II / 41047-8-II 861, 587 P.2d 179 (1978) (quoting Websters Third New International Dictionary (1969))). [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Websters Third International Dictionary 736 (1976) (citing “an [elite] brand of coffee” as example of usage). [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 3:01 am by Jeremy Saland
” In People v Riso (Anthony) 2013 NY Slip Op 50437(U) Decided on March 27, 2013 Appellate Term, First Department, the defendant sought to have his conviction overturned for shoplifting after he pleaded guilty to New York’s “shoplifting crime” of New York Penal Law 155.25 by arguing, in part, that there was not sufficient asportation. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:44 pm
Rev. 480 (1990), has been cited for the proposition that the brief that Dawn Johnsen wrote in Webster v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Webster, 32 Misc 3d 1202(A), 2011 NY Slip Op 51152(U) (Sup Ct Kings County June 23, 2011). [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 3:32 pm by Zack Bluestone
Two days later, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) ruled that it has jurisdiction to hear the Philippines v. [read post]