Search for: "*u.s. v. Barbour" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2023, 2:39 pm
Barbour (1881) 104 U.S. 126 (Barton) and its progeny, the Barton doctrine “requires, before filing a lawsuit against officers appointed or approved by the court, obtaining leave from the bankruptcy court that appointed or approved them. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 7:26 am
"Among the cases on last Thursday's conference was No. 06-10605, Barbour v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am by Ray Mullman
The former bug exterminator from Sugar Land became majority leader of the U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 8:10 pm
Among the cases on last Thursday's conference was No. 06-10605, Barbour v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:02 am
The Bar has counsel for the defendant listed as "Rachel Barbour. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 5:47 am
March 2, 2007): As the standard that a consent to searches be made voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently, is the same as for the waiver of defendant's Fifth Amendment right regarding self-incrimination under Miranda, see Barbour, 70 F.3d at 585 and Colorado v Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 169-70, 107 S. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Mehalic of the West Virginia Business Litigation Blog spends some time talking about Barbour v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 7:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Yes, the rule is tricky, which is why lawyers have to read the rule carefully and really understand what it means.The case is Barbour v. [read post]