Search for: "*u.s. v. Barbour"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2007, 6:01 pm
High Court Refuses to Hear Death Row Claims in Barbour v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:53 am
In its recent decision Barbour v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:39 pm
Barbour (1881) 104 U.S. 126 (Barton) and its progeny, the Barton doctrine “requires, before filing a lawsuit against officers appointed or approved by the court, obtaining leave from the bankruptcy court that appointed or approved them. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:13 am
The United States Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from Louisiana in the case of Barbour v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 7:26 am
"Among the cases on last Thursday's conference was No. 06-10605, Barbour v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 10:10 pm
Barbour, 2008 U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
The former bug exterminator from Sugar Land became majority leader of the U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 8:10 pm
Among the cases on last Thursday's conference was No. 06-10605, Barbour v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:49 pm
In fact, the U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:02 am
The Bar has counsel for the defendant listed as "Rachel Barbour. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 5:47 am
March 2, 2007): As the standard that a consent to searches be made voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently, is the same as for the waiver of defendant's Fifth Amendment right regarding self-incrimination under Miranda, see Barbour, 70 F.3d at 585 and Colorado v Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 169-70, 107 S. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 10:05 am
Supreme Court’s 2005 decision, Kelo v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 4:30 am
Mehalic of the West Virginia Business Litigation Blog spends some time talking about Barbour v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 7:12 am
Yes, the rule is tricky, which is why lawyers have to read the rule carefully and really understand what it means.The case is Barbour v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 2:11 pm
In Barbour v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
See 42 U.S .C. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:44 am
There were two different opinions in Barbour v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 4:54 am
Supreme Court in Troy Barbour v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 6:34 am
Barbour, 104 U.S. 126 (1881)], a court in equity had appointed a receiver “of all the property, rights, and franchises” of a railroad company. [read post]
