Search for: "*u.s. v. Bartholomew" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2012, 7:19 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 152440, Dec. 12, 2011) and dismissed a Muslim inmate's claim that on one occasion while in a restricted privileges dorm he was not allowed to attend a Friday Jumah service.In Bartholomew v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 11:00 am
Bartholomew, 516 U.S. 1 (1995) and Kimberlin v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:39 pm by John Floyd
Bartholomew (U.S. 1995): The failure to disclose inadmissible information does not constitute a Brady violation where there is only “mere speculation” about whether its disclosure would have led to admissible evidence. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm by Mark Graber
The Federalist Papers anticipated that U.S. constitutional developments would clarify and reduce constitutional ambiguities. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 8:44 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Rocketdyne plant that built world’s most powerful rocket engines being razed, August 25, 2016, By Dana Bartholomew, LA Daily News More Blog Entries: Grant v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 8:44 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Rocketdyne plant that built world’s most powerful rocket engines being razed, August 25, 2016, By Dana Bartholomew, LA Daily News More Blog Entries: Grant v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Richard Renner
., New Futures Trading International Corporation and Henry Roche, U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/MGu5uA (Andrew Bartholomew) Legal Technology Observer Concludes Today, Inviting You to Continue the Conversation - http://bit.ly/LRn3EO (Christy Burke) Making Sense of ‘Kleen Products’: Is it Really about Predictive Coding?  [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/1gd0GXq (Andrew Brabban)Lawyers Choose their Favorites for ’60 Sites in 60 Minutes’ http://bit.ly/1iZkYZ5 (Victor Li)Preserving Attorney-Client Privilege in Internal Investigations after Barko v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]