Search for: "*united States v. Hubbard"
Results 21 - 40
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:01 am
The ruling in KSR v. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
District Court for the District of Columbia: In re Application of the United States of America for Nondisclosure Order, 2014 WL 1273227 (2014) (“In re Application, supra”). [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:58 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:44 am
The Court noted that Hubbard v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:44 am
The Court noted that Hubbard v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:40 pm
P. 60(b)”); United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has developed and applied a 2-prong test “drawn directly from the wording of §501(c)(3) and the legislative history of its enactment. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
After last year’s guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, it is now the turn of trade marks sharing elements with little or no distinctiveness.* Pom Wonderful the tenacious -- in pursuit of trade mark rightsNeil's first post of this year is about Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, a decision rendered a few days ago by the 9th U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:57 am
The American position, so they explain, is unforgiving and typified by the decision in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
In Godoy v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:57 am
Hubbard, Deputy Attorney General; Karl D. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
He also held, in Hubbard v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:10 pm
United Auto. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
Circuit Court of Appeals on 30 December, Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al, No. 14-55253. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:13 am
United States and reached different results in cases involving the revocation of a defendant’s supervised release. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 4:23 am
Cir. 1991) (noting that there is a “strong presumption in favor of public access to judicial proceedings”); United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm
The Court noted that Hubbard v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
