Search for: "19 Recordings Limited v. Sony Music Entertainment" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
A&M RECORDS, INC., a corporation; GEFFEN RECORDS, INC., a corporation; INTERSCOPE RECORDS; SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MCA RECORDS, INC.; ATLANTIC RECORDING CORP.; ISLAND RECORDS, INC.; MOTOWN RECORD CO.; CAPITOL RECORDS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NAPSTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant.JERRY LEIBER, individually and doing business as, JERRY LEIBER MUSIC; MIKE STOLLER and FRANK… [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm by streetartandlaw
RCA Records –  Sony Music Entertainement (Filed: February 24, 2012 as 1:2012cv10357) 03) Hayuk v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:55 am by Eric Goldman
On September 11, 2013, five major record labels (ABKCO Music & Records, Capitol Records, Sony Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, and Warner Music Group) filed a similar lawsuit in state court in California. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 6:49 pm
A jury awarded Stephen Popovich over five million dollars on his claim that Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., breached its duty to affix Popovich's record company logo to four Meat Loaf albums. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm by firemarkVA
  American Idol Lawsuit Claims Sony Stiffs Carrie Underwood, Kelly Clarkson 19 Recordings Limited v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
.* Kimble v Marvel Entertainment: when post-expiry patent royalties meet stare decisisThe unsatisfying U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 And finally Eleonora updated on the CJEU's decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment where the CJEU said that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive, but Member States can protect them: "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may prohibit the provision to the public fixations of their broadcasts [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am by Eric Goldman
  For example, when a sound recording of a musical work gets played on Spotify, both the owner of the copyright in the musical work and the owner of copyright in the sound recording (the derivative work) are entitled to royalties for the public performance. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm by Barry Sookman
Jack, 2014 BCSC 1063 Cartier International AG & Ors v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd & Ors [2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch) 17 October 2014) Arista Records, LLC, v Tkach 15-CV-3701 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y Jun. 3, 2015) Sony Music Entertainment (Ireland) Ltd  v UPC Communications Ireland Ltd (No. 1) [2015] IEHC 317 (27 March 2015) Copyright BestWater International (Order) [2014] EUECJ C-348 / 13_CO (21 October 2014) 1967 Ltd & Ors v… [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 510 U.S. 569 (1994) 5, 7, 10 Computer Assocs. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am by Howard Knopf
On-line downloads of games generate approximately 5% of sales of interactive entertainment software products. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:24 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Proposal lacks contours; doesn’t define space shifting, doesn’t limit to owners v. lawful possessors/renters. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier… [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
To set the record straight: Lofgren was wrong, and Pallante was right. [read post]