Search for: "5 Cal.4th 1"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,002
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2016, 12:00 am
Superior Court, 36 Cal.4th 148 (Cal. 2005). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) Must a city comply with the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] (Pub. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 11:38 am
Cedar Fair (2011) 196 Cal. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 12:08 pm
Williams (2013) 57 Cal.4th 776, 784 (Williams).) [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:30 am
Regents of University of Cal., 88 Cal. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:15 pm
Jones, 1 Cal.3d at p. 107, 81 Cal.Rptr. 592, 460 P.2d 464; Beyerbach, 42 Cal.2d at p. 28, 265 P.2d 1. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 4:49 am
Henderson, 439 F.3d 1, 5 n. 1 (1st Cir.2006) (assuming the Act would give rise to one for analysis, but not so holding); Jeseritz v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Superior Court (2005) 135 Cal.App.4th 263, 269-270, 285, fn. 5 [insurance company paid insured's medical bills, then sued to recover that money when insured collected damages from the third party who caused his injuries; insured had standing to bring UCL claim against insurance company]; Starr Gordon v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
On appeal, the defendants claim that (1) the California judgment is unenforceable for lack of personal jurisdiction, (2) the contract is unenforceable under the Home Solicitation Sales Act (HSSA), General Statutes § 42-134a et seq., and (3) the amount of damages awarded by the trial court was improper. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 9:41 am
” (Broughton, supra, 21 Cal.4th at p. 1082; see Cruz, supra, 30 Cal.4th at p. 315.) [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 10:45 am
(Cortez, supra, 23 Cal.4th at pp. 173.) [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
(June 5, 1990) amending Cal. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:43 am
”’ (Citing 1 Kostka & Zischke, Practice Under the Cal. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:46 am
City of Santa Monica (2013) 56 Cal. 4th 203. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 9:45 am
Lucky Stores, Inc., 17 Cal. 4th 553 (1998).[4] Stop Youth Addiction, 17 Cal. 4th at 570. [5] 20 Cal. 4th 163 (1999). [6] Not at issue was whether it would be appropriate to consider Safeway’s sales as not “below cost” when its profitable grocery sale margins were combined with the below-acquisition price of its fuel sales. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 1:12 pm
[5] 228 Cal. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:36 am
Exchange, (1991) 1 Cal.App.4th 712, 717, 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 1. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004, 139 Cal.Rptr.3d 315, 273 P.3d 513 (Cal.2012). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
Bramalea California, Inc. (2001)26 Cal.4th 1, 4. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 1:04 pm
App. 4th 285 (2015) (Gerard I). [read post]
