Search for: "5 Cal.4th 1" Results 21 - 40 of 997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2013, 2:18 pm by Kyndra Casper
(August 5, 2013, S202828) ____ Cal.4th ____ On August 5, 2013, the California Supreme Court issued a split decision in Neighbors for Smart Rail v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
Harris (2013) 57 Cal.4th 64, 69.) [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 9:00 am
So important is this goal of family maintenance and reunification that the California Supreme Court has noted, "up until the time the section 366.26(termination of parental rights) hearing is set, the parent's interest in reunification is given precedence over the child's need for stability and permanency" [ In re Marilyn H. (1993) 5 Cal. 4th 295, 310, 19 Cal. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
’ ” (Snowney, supra, 35 Cal.4th 1054, 1062, quoting Pavlovich, supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 269.) [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:14 pm by Uthman Law Office
Franklin (2016) 63 Cal.4th 261, because he stated was eligible for a Penal Code section 3051 youth offender parole hearing. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
 (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 1, 5), although `every juvenile probation condition must be made to fit the circumstances and the minor. [read post]