Search for: "5 Cal.4th 1" Results 21 - 40 of 1,001
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2024, 12:16 pm
Berzon, Dissent, "Dissentals," and Decision Making, 100 Cal. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 3:13 pm by Stephanie Lowe and Peter J. Brown
Board of Trustees of California State University (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 359, has also determined that a paid administrative leave may constitute an adverse employment action in a discrimination case. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:07 am by Chloe Chung and Alyssa Sones
State Bd. of Equalization, 19 Cal.4th 1, 7–8 (Cal. 1998) (“The standard for judicial review of agency interpretation of the law is the independent judgment of the court, giving deference to the determination of the agency appropriate to the circumstances of the agency action. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 9:29 am by Kaitlin Schoberl
A rotor blade struck a car, killing one person and injuring another.5 The family sued Robinson for strict products liability for a defective component and negligence for failing to properly diagnose and repair the problem.6 The trial court denied Robinson’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, but the Second District reversed.7 This article focuses on the Court’s analysis of the constitutional prong of the due process analysis. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am by centerforartlaw
By Atreya Mathur and Beverly Osazuwa Dance has always been a significant part of human expression, and the expansion of the 1976 Copyright Act was the first U.S. law to make choreography copyrightable.[1] With the rise of MTV and music videos in the eighties, dance routines like those by Michael Peters (“Thriller”) and Anthony Thomas (“Rhythm Nation”) saw mass popularization. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 10:12 am by Arthur F. Coon
” ”  The Court of Appeal thus focused its attention on appellant’s two primary arguments:  that no substantial evidence supported the City’s findings (1) that the project site had no habitat value for endangered, rare or threatened species, and (2) that the project would not have significant air quality impacts. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm by Melissa Tremblay
Department of Justice and the whistleblowers’ bar.[1] In its U.S. ex rel. [read post]