Search for: "A Community Voice v. EPA" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm by bndmorris
Loewy’s article Cops, Cars, and Citizens: Fixing the Broken Balance was cited in the following article: Henry Patrick, South Dakota v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 10:34 am by Christopher J. Walker
 New Voices is a terrific way to get to know other folks in our section, so please join us! [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Zoe Stern
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:31 pm by NARF
Communities as caretakers: The Indian Child Welfare Act as an antiracist framework for all child welfare cases. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 9:10 pm by The Regulatory Review
Suicide rates are even higher for the LGBTQ community. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 12:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
In part through these efforts, the EPA dropped its regulatory action. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Hawaii Wildlife Fund, which held that a Clean Water Act permit is required for either a direct discharge of pollutants into navigable waters or its functional equivalent, “is flexible enough that EPA should have room to provide more concrete guidance to the regulated community, without running afoul of the Court’s authoritative construction of the statute. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
At The Daily Signal, Elizabeth Slattery looks at the First Amendment issues in American Legion and Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 1:49 pm by Seth Jaffe
  That was the subject of last week’s decision in A Community Voice v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 6:43 am by Adam J. White
’s commitment to the Paris Accord is precisely the sort of “reliance interest” which, under the Supreme Court’s explanation in FCC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:34 am by Schachtman
Plaintiffs’ counsel sought him out for his calm and unflappable demeanor, stentorious voice, and propensity for over-interpreting chest radiographs. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
EPA) that that regulating greenhouse gases might impair the President's ability to negotiate with ‘key developing nations’ to reduce emissions’ on the grounds that the EPA had “made no showing that it issued the ruling in question here after consultation with the State Department. [read post]