Search for: "ABC Insurance Company" Results 141 - 160 of 658
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2020, 1:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 27 and Tuesday 28 July 2020, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Company Chubb. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Jordan Rothman
[ABC News] * Tesla has filed a lawsuit against rival Rivian for allegedly poaching talent and trade secrets. [read post]
And must we choose between (a) dismantling the ABC test and AB 5 and (b) leaving AB 5 in place to require that all gig sector employees be classified as employees? [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 2:26 am by UKSC Blog
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd… [read post]
As we wrote here, AB5 codified and expanded the “ABC test” adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 5:30 am by Elizabeth Hampton
  of an insurance company, special care should be exercised ... [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considers whether the rule against reflective loss bars creditors of a company from claiming directly against a third party for asset-stripping the company. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 1 July 2020, the Privy Council will hear the appeal of Presidential Insurance Company Ltd v Twitz & Anor (Trinidad & Tobago). [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am by UKSC Blog
This appeal considers the circumstances in which the UK-domiciled parent company of a multi-national group of companies may owe a common law duty of care to individuals who allegedly suffer serious harm as a result of alleged systemic health, safety and environmental failings of one of its overseas subsidiaries as the operator of a joint venture operation. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 15 June and Tuesday 16 June 2020, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Shagang Shipping Company Ltd (in liquidation) v HNA Group Company Ltd. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International… [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The central issue on this appeal is whether the Respondent acted in breach of any fiduciary duty when US$13 million was transferred from Pioneer Freight Futures Company Limited to a third party shortly before the Company entered into provisional liquidation. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:26 pm by Nassiri Law
In that case, the court adopted what’s now called the ABC test to determine whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee. [read post]
22 May 2020, 2:31 pm by Unknown
., a condominium association hired a public adjuster for the claims process and a construction company to conduct estimates and repairs after the condominiums sustained hail damage.[7] After a dispute over the amount of the claims paid, the association sued the insurers for breach of contract, among other claims.[8] The insurers counterclaimed, alleging fraud and civil conspiracy against the association, the public adjuster, and the construction company.[9] In its… [read post]
20 May 2020, 10:39 am by Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C.
Employees of companies with more than 500 employees are not eligible (though such companies may have paid leave rules they would be obligated to honor). [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:11 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International… [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:53 am by Joy Waltemath
The rideshare companies cannot meet A.B. 5’s “ABC” test, the plaintiffs contend. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Duval v 11-13 Randolph… [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Duval v 11-13 Randolph… [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Alex Barthet
For example, maybe ABC Plumbing owes you money, and the business closed and opened XYZ Plumbing – to avoid the judgment. [read post]