Search for: "ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
These include digital forensic preservation and investigation, notification of a broad range of third parties and other constituencies,[1] fulfillment of state and federal compliance obligations, potential litigation, engagement with law enforcement, the provision of credit monitoring, crisis management, a communications plan – and the list goes on. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
, (Ars Technica), (Patent Prospector), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (IP Law Observer), (PLI), (PLI), (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog), (The Invent Blog), (IP Spotlight), (Just a Patent Examiner), (Techdirt), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patently-O), (IAM), (IP ThinkTank), (Against Monopoly), (Against Monopoly), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Ladas & Parry), Global Global - General Virtual monopoly – four strategic… [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:10 am
” Amchem Products, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm
State Bank of Bellingham v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
: (Part 1 - SPICY IP), (Part 2 - SPICY IP) Global – Copyright International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI): ‘Three strikes’ effort hit worldwide home run: (Ars Technica), How to attribute a Creative Commons licensed work: (Molly Kleinman), Chrysalis disappoints, as new artists fail to incubate: (IP finance), DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) Events 26 August:… [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Chairman Battista did not pass on the validity of Advanced Stretchforming. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Inc.,[8] which had different facts to the case in point, and also emphasized the decision in Evans v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
Clayton County (11th Circuit) and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (creativecommons.org)Pharma & BiotechPharma & Biotech - GeneralScience Commons news: A commons-sense approach to winning the drug discovery lottery: (creativecommons.org),India: Hindu Business Line reports on why pharma companies are pushing for tax incentives: (Spicy IP), India: J Mitra gets injunction against Span Diagnostics in patent dispute before Delhi High Court over device used in detection of Hep C: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), India: Patent Office… [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:13 am
In the case of “Aunt Sally v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
This bill is intended to supersede a California appellate ruling, Progressive Concrete Inc., v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
” Click Here Railroad Company to Pay $4 Million Penalty for 2005 Chlorine Spill in Graniteville, SC. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), failed to answer this question. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
As found by the Federal Court in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
– Discussion of Catherine Tremblay’s article on cost approach: (IP finance), US Congress cites free expression as reason ICANN must remain controlled by US government: (IP Justice), A new organisation around IP in your company? [read post]
