Search for: "AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION v. UNITED STATES"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
In Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 4:15 am
., Inc. v Amalgamated Tr. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
§ 160(b), applied to a hybrid claim against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) for breach of a collective bargaining agreement and against Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union (the “Union” or “Local 689?) [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am
Its operators and maintenance employees are members of Appellee Amalgamated Transit Union (“Union”). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 5:38 am
Weigand v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:00 am
Weigand v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:00 am
So said the Second District Court of Appeal in Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 3:56 pm
Amalgamated Transit Union Local No. 1338, No. 06-0034. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
” (Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL–CIO v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 4:48 am
See also Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1309, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 10:12 pm
Dean Morris, L.L.P., 444 F.3d 365, 368-69 (5th Cir.2006); Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1309 v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
”) Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
As stated by Ontario’s Divisional Court in Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113, 2007 CanLII 59152, this means that the manner in which evidence is received by the Board is within its discretion and there is no requirement that evidence be received in the form of oral testimony. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Murphy v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:01 pm
Supreme Court Cases to Watch in 2008: AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:00 am
Then in Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:00 pm
See Sav-On Drug Stores v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
Charges filed by Amalgamated Transit Local 1637; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1), (2), and (5). [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 10:54 pm
V, 1292b] These insights apply, I believe, with equal force to the constitution of a law for corporate codes. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 4:38 pm
Member Liebman found that the Union had met its burden of establishing relevance by pointing not only to a relevant contractual provision, but also to facts prompting its concern that the contract had been violated: an apparent increase in the volume of subcontracts and a possible decrease of two bargaining-unit positions, coupled with the Union business agent's observation that unit employees seemed to be idle… [read post]
