Search for: "AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION v. UNITED STATES"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
The short summary I prepared fleshes out the themes I hope to cover: Regulatory governance is well within a process of transformation from a managerial system deeply embedded in the classical model of the rule-of-law state grounded in positive (or customary) law pronounced by an authoritative body clothed in the legislative power, to the world of the panopticon and the disciplines. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
It has been acknowledged by the Group of Seven, and by the European Union as well. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
”) Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am
Its operators and maintenance employees are members of Appellee Amalgamated Transit Union (“Union”). [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:00 am
Weigand v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 5:38 am
Weigand v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 10:54 pm
V, 1292b] These insights apply, I believe, with equal force to the constitution of a law for corporate codes. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 4:15 am
., Inc. v Amalgamated Tr. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
As stated by Ontario’s Divisional Court in Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113, 2007 CanLII 59152, this means that the manner in which evidence is received by the Board is within its discretion and there is no requirement that evidence be received in the form of oral testimony. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
§ 160(b), applied to a hybrid claim against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) for breach of a collective bargaining agreement and against Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union (the “Union” or “Local 689?) [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
” (Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL–CIO v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:00 am
Then in Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 3:56 pm
Amalgamated Transit Union Local No. 1338, No. 06-0034. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:01 pm
Supreme Court Cases to Watch in 2008: AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 4:38 pm
Member Liebman found that the Union had met its burden of establishing relevance by pointing not only to a relevant contractual provision, but also to facts prompting its concern that the contract had been violated: an apparent increase in the volume of subcontracts and a possible decrease of two bargaining-unit positions, coupled with the Union business agent's observation that unit employees seemed to be idle… [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:00 pm
See Sav-On Drug Stores v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Murphy v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:00 am
So said the Second District Court of Appeal in Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
In Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
