Search for: "AMERICAN EXPRESS CO. v. STATE NAT. BANK"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2016, 10:08 pm
Plaintiff sued Defendant, American Express, and John Doe/ABC Co. to recover payments made by customer’s credit cards. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:15 am
– Austin, Aug. 23, 2018) This appeal from a summary judgment for the bank in a credit card collection case illustrates the pitfalls of consumer advocacy in the State of Texas.Taylor v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
The Court however, made short shrift of that argument by stating that the bank was allowed to modify the terms. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
See Charter Nat'l Bank-Houston v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
The Center now has some 80 lawyers and non-lawyer advisors distributed across 27 states, but expects eventually to have representatives in all 50 states plus the nation’s offshore possessions, such as the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, and the U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
American Express Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:40 pm
Franchise Co., 178 F.3d 1126, 1129 (11th Cir. 1999)5 In Bonner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 1:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
Bank Nat. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
Section 9026.5 does not restrict Plaintiffs’ own expressive activity. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
See Bd. of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers’ Nat’l Pension Fund v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
Supermarkets, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
When discovery ended in early January 2020, Care One moved for summary judgment, seeking a determination that plaintiff could not assert a claim based on Care One's breach of any state or federal statutes or regulations. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
See Pony Express Courier Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:02 am
Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
American Commercial Arbitration Rules R-46 (2013). [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
" Nat'l Sanitary Supply Co. v. [read post]
