Search for: "ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA" Results 81 - 100 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2009, 5:30 pm by B.W. Barnett
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and elaborated upon in Bledsoe v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:29 am
 The Court affirmed California's three-strikes law in Ewing v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
The second case, Sullivan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:09 pm
State, the Indiana Supreme Court expressly departed from the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Anders v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
Massengill, No. 08-15207, 2009 WL 714259 (11th Cir., March 19, 2009), the Court denied the defendant’s attorney’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 2:52 pm
In October I wrote about the risks of moving, pursuant to People v Crawford (71 AD2d 38) and Anders v California (386 US 738), to be relieved as assigned appellate attorney on the ground that the case presents no non-frivolous issues. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
In federal court this is known as an Anders brief (Anders v California, 386 US 738). [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
On appeal, his appointed counsel filed a brief, pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 6:49 am
Jan. 15, 2007) (found here ) Whitley's attorney filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:27 am
In September 2007, Appellant's court-appointed appellate counsel was allowed to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:27 am
In September 2007, Appellant's court-appointed appellate counsel was allowed to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
ANDERS ASSISTANT PUBLIC ADVOCATESCARRIE F. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 5:34 pm
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), on the ground that there is no non-frivolous basis for appeal. [read post]