Search for: "ANDERS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 81 - 98
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
The second case, Sullivan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:09 pm
State, the Indiana Supreme Court expressly departed from the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Anders v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 7:02 am
The term comes from the case of Anders v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
Massengill, No. 08-15207, 2009 WL 714259 (11th Cir., March 19, 2009), the Court denied the defendant’s attorney’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 2:52 pm
In October I wrote about the risks of moving, pursuant to People v Crawford (71 AD2d 38) and Anders v California (386 US 738), to be relieved as assigned appellate attorney on the ground that the case presents no non-frivolous issues. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
In federal court this is known as an Anders brief (Anders v California, 386 US 738). [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
On appeal, his appointed counsel filed a brief, pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Supreme Court, June 02, 2008 US v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Baze v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
California Appellate Districts, April 09, 2008 Salma v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 6:49 am
Jan. 15, 2007) (found here ) Whitley's attorney filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:27 am
In September 2007, Appellant's court-appointed appellate counsel was allowed to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:27 am
In September 2007, Appellant's court-appointed appellate counsel was allowed to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:10 am
See Anders v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
ANDERS ASSISTANT PUBLIC ADVOCATESCARRIE F. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 5:34 pm
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), on the ground that there is no non-frivolous basis for appeal. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 10:01 am
§ 2.HELD: Under reasoning of Anders v. [read post]
