Search for: "APOTEX CORP." Results 41 - 60 of 319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm by Patent Docs
• Defendants: Apotex, Inc.; Apotex Corp. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:06 pm by Patent Docs
• Defendants: Actavis LLC; Apotex, Inc.; Apotex Corp.; Bedford Laboratories, Inc.; Dr. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:57 am
Corp. of Am., 775 F.2d 1107, 1124 (Fed. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:39 pm by Patent Docs
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. et al. 0:13-cv-60601; filed March 14, 2013 in the Southern District of Florida • Plaintiffs: Apotex, Inc.; Apotex Corp. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 9:06 pm by Patent Docs
• Defendants: Apotex Inc.; Apotex Corp.; Sandoz, Inc.; Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc.; Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Watson Laboratories, Inc.; Watson Pharma, Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:53 pm by Patent Docs
• Defendants: Apotex Inc.; Apotex Corp. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:57 am
The two sets of defendants, Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., and Torpharm Inc. on the one hand and Impax Laboratories on the other, were found to infringe the patents in suit, and... [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:00 am by Courtenay Brinckerhoff
Apotex Corp., the Federal Circuit held that the district court had jurisdiction over AstraZeneca’s ANDA complaint, but also held that the complaint should be dismissed for failing to state a viable claim for relief because the ANDAs included Section viii... [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:59 am by Jason Rantanen
” Titan Tire Corp., 566 F.3d at 1376 (citation omitted). [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
On April 23, 2020, the CAFC decided a case related to Gilenya, which related to the issue of standing of the company Argentum to challenge US 9,187,405 in IPR proceedings.On February 3, 2017, Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 8:55 pm by Patent Docs
Life Technologies Corp. et al. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 8:35 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Last month, the Federal Circuit affirmed a District Court's finding on summary judgment that Merck & Co., Inc. had not obtained favorable rulings in two prior proceedings by fraud. [read post]