Search for: "APPLE v. STATE INSURANCE FUND" Results 1 - 20 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
PPACA added new Sections 4375, 4376, and 4377 to the Code to provide a funding source for the Trust Fund. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:33 am by David DePaolo
Her employer and its insurance carrier, the State Accident Fund, admitted that Nicholson fell at work but denied she sustained compensable injuries by an accident arising out of her employment. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 1:38 am
On August 21st, Wisconsin Attorney General J.B Van Hollen announced his decision not to defend Wisconsin's new domestic registry law in Appling v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Yet, here, the insurance carrier (or, more accurately, the UEGF) was free to have another bite at the apple. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:17 am by Abbe Gluck
  More importantly, if we are going to compare apples to oranges, the ACA’s Medicaid provisions have an explicit provision stating that if the state declines to participate, it loses the program funds (this was the provision at issue in NFIB v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 5:43 pm
Apple Doesn't Have One The Watchmen Movie: Copyright Infringement, Injunctions, Options, Laches, and a Circuit Split All in One Citigroup v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:01 am by Eric
Techdirt * The Daily Beast questions the Berkman Center's funding and Zittrain's criticisms of Apple. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:36 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
The demand letters mentions rights of recovery if there are other related insurance settlements, essentially alluding to its potential need for another bite at the apple. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:48 pm by Alison Barnes
State Health Insurance Exchanges to certify acceptable policies and their premiums, and advise consumers, might be unable to compare the prices of apples and oranges. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:16 am by Abbe Gluck
  More importantly, if we are going to compare apples to oranges, the ACA’s Medicaid provisions have an explicit provision stating that if the state declines to participate, it loses the program funds (this was the provision at issue in NFIB v. [read post]