Search for: "APPLE v. STATE INSURANCE FUND" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
The case concerned a medical service provider (MDK) who had processed the personal health data of an incapacitated employee and passed the information to a health insurance fund. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am by Stephen Dnes
The case has similarities to Chevron review in the United States, but without the subsequent developments like the analysis of whether policy is properly promulgated to the agencies, following West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Note, however, that this figure does not include class action suits filed in state court or state court derivative suits, including those in the Delaware Court of Chancery. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The majority of its funding comes from Apple, however. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Its ranking is kept down in large part by its worst-in-the-country unemployment insurance tax system and by its property tax system, which ranks 45th (due to business property taxes and estate tax burdens) despite attempts to cap residential property tax burdens. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Securities class action litigation activity involving IPO companies recently has been a significant concern, for the companies themselves as well as for their insurers. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm by vforberger
D21-12, Secretary waiver of provisions for the sake of funding flexibility This proposal expands the general savings clause (the Department’s secretary can waive compliance with any specific state requirement should that state requirement be found to conflict with federal law) to also allow the Department secretary to waive requirements that prevent the state from taking full advantage of federal funding opportunities (like immediately waiving… [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Based on an exception articulated in Montana v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin and Marci A. Hamilton
Justice Kagan wrote, “As the per curiam’s reliance on separate opinions and unreasoned orders signals, the law does not require that the State equally treat apples and watermelons. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Kristian Soltes
The bill would ban all mergers and acquisitions for companies with over $100 billion in values, the release stated. [read post]
  Thus, the taxpayer would receive a deduction in determining state taxable income for interest expense incurred to generate income that is not subject to tax in the state. [read post]