Search for: "AS v TK" Results 81 - 100 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2008, 10:52 am
That seems to have been the court's impression in TK-7 v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:43 pm by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Recall the history of INS v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:50 pm by Giles Peaker
The history of the N293A affair is in these posts (in reverse order), including the somewhat unfortunate coda of Partridge v Gupta (2017) EWHC 2110 (QB). [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:26 am
 PatentsActavis v ICOS - NetherlandsLast year, IPKat reported on the UK Court of Appeal decision Actavis v ICOS [2017] EWCA Civ 1671, in which the concept of "obvious to try" for a particular dosage regime was assessed in the context of clinical trial data. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:51 pm by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:40 am by Jim Gerl
  In the last installment, I discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 2:54 pm by Jim Gerl
  In a later installment, I discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 12:53 pm by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:52 pm by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:59 am by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:41 pm
Such is the case with Lima v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
On August 28, 2020, the Court of Appeal for Ontario ruled, in Duffy v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:15 am by Steve Delchin
  See Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary v. [read post]