Search for: "ASTRAZENECA LP"
Results 121 - 138
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2010, 12:27 pm
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 2009 WL 2231686 (M.D. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, 634 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 2011). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, 500 F.Supp.2d 736 (S.D. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
See AstraZeneca LP v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
AstraZeneca LP, 605 F.Supp.2d 669, 678-79 (W.D.Pa.2009) (discussing why the “professional paradigm” places the physician as the relevant decision maker in the health services industry), aff’d on other grounds, 372 Fed. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, 634 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 2011). [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
We hope all our readers had excellent holidays, didn’t get stranded in the snow (here on the US East Coast), and received lots of desired presents due to what the economic stats we’ve seen are saying has been a better than expected retailing season. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
., claiming infringement of three patents covering its enlarged-prostate treatment, Avodart; Barr challenges GSK’s Avodart patent: (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb),Fosamax (Alendronate) – Courts in Netherlands and France both invalidate Merck Sharp & Dohme’s European patents for Alendronate: (IP Law360), (The IP Factor), (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), Hectorol – Genzyme Corp launches US patent suit against Pentech Pharmaceuticals to prevent it from… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 12:12 pm
The outcome was a vacating of the district court's grant of JMOL and a lot of discussion of drug "skinny labels": GlaxoSmithKline LLC and SmithKline Beecham (Cork) Ltd. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:22 pm
AstraZeneca LP and Cephalon Inc. paid the United States $26.7 million and $4.3 million, respectively, in separate settlements for allegedly underpaying rebates owed under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Astrazenaca Pharmaceuticals, LP, 223 F.R.D. 659, 663-64 (M.D. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
After a long winter, the cherry trees are finally managing to blossom. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Patent Baristas),Vietnam : new developments in patent protection for medical uses: (Patent Docs),Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation licenses stem cell patents to BioTime: (IPBiz)Pharma & Biotech - ProductsFloxin (Ofloxacin) –US Supreme Court declines Daiichi Sankyo’s request for appeal of CAFC decision reversing Daichii’s initial win in its ofloxacin patent infringement case against Apotex: (IP Law360),Galvus (Vildagliptin) – Indian patent granted… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
