Search for: "AVERY v. STATE" Results 261 - 280 of 296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
State Farm Mutual, No. 20693, Order (Portsmouth Sep. 14, 1995); Schoonmaker v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:27 pm
I also thought it would be useful to consider what measures could have been undertaken to prevent the misunderstandings that led to the 3M v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
McCauley     Southern District of Ohio at Dayton 08a0422p.06  Chamar Avery v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 1:52 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in the case of Doninger v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
DiMarzio Newmark Knight Frank Capital Group Investment Sales Broker 1 Edward Lombardo Pacific National Bank Commercial Real Estate Finance 3 helen anderson Coldwell Banker Hunt Kennedy Brokerage - Residential 2 Mark Stempel The Riese Organization Vice President of Real Estate 2 Derek Dizhi Huang City Link Realty Inc Associate Broker 3 Ryland Mennell America's Realty LLC Brokerage - Residential 2 Charles Zivancev Corcoran Sales 3 Terry Lawler … [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Brands, Incorporated    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0390n.06  2008/07/01 Avery v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Brands, Incorporated    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0390n.06  2008/07/01 Avery v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:44 am
The court highlighted the difference between California and federal standards regarding summary judgment/adjudication motions:"Pointing out through argument, as Avery Dennison has done, that Fotheringham has no evidence of malice and oppression or of the requisite managing agent conduct is inadequate. . . . 'Whereas, under federal law, "pointing out through argument" [citation] may be sufficient [citation], under state law, it is not.' (Id. at p. 855, fn.… [read post]