Search for: "Aaron Bruhl"
Results 61 - 66
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2014, 7:28 pm
Bruhl suggests. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:30 pm
In his paper, Aaron-Andrew P. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Gordon (Yale University) [former Stanford faculty]; Dan Hulsebosch (New York University); Mark McKenna (Notre Dame) (Fall 2010); Bernadette Meyler (Cornell) (Spring 2011); Nicholas Rosenkranz (Georgetown) (Fall 2010); William Simon (Columbia University) [emeritus, Stanford] Stetson: Diane Klein (La Verne) (2010-11); John Lenich (Nebraska) (Fall 2010); James Maxeiner (Baltimore) (Fall 2010) Texas: Aaron Bruhl (Houston) (Fall 2010); Adam Rosenzweig… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am
Elsewhere in the blogosphere, though he reserves comment on the opinion as a matter of public policy, Aaron Bruhl of PrawfsBlawg describes the decision as “one logically reasonable interpretation of the precedents,” and he also suggests that, despite previous pro-arbitration opinions from liberal justices, the Court will revert to splitting along “the usual political lines” in future arbitration issues. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
(A co-author of mine, Aaron-Andrew Bruhl, and I proposed using plagiarism software as a partial solution to this problem in a recent paper.) [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Wasserman maintains that the problem with “what Andrew-Aaron Bruhl … calls the one good plaintiff rule” “is that all relief is plaintiff-specific–a remedy for A is different than a remedy for B, even if they both want the same thing,” so “either the Court’s own rule is universal or it is calling on lower courts to draw an impossible distinction in practice. [read post]
