Search for: "Abbe Gluck" Results 81 - 100 of 126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2018, 10:05 am by JB
Louis 840 60 7 Martha Minow Harvard University 820 63 8 Jody Freeman Harvard University 800 54 9 Catharine MacKinnon University of Michigan 780 71 10 Rachel Barkow New York University 775 47 11 Kimberle Crenshaw Columbia University 710 59 12 Pamela Karlan Stanford University 670 59 13 Oona Hathaway Yale University 660 45 14 Heather Gerken Yale University 650 49 15-T Pamela Samuelson University of California-Berkeley 640 69 15-T Rochelle Dreyfuss New York… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:25 am by Ilya Somin
In a recent Harvard Law Review article for which they surveyed forty-two federal appellate judges, Judge Richard Posner and Abbe Gluck found widespread skepticism about Chevron among both liberals and conservatives. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:48 pm by Ilya Somin
For those interested, there is a more extensive discussion of the severability issue in the amicus brief I joined with several other legal scholars, including Jonathan Adler, Nicholas Bagley, Abbe Gluck, and Kevin Walsh. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
I then pulled up Abbe Gluck’s marvelous article on interpreting state statutes in federal courts. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Simone Hussussian
Yale Law School Professor Abbe Gluck suggests that the duty to faithfully execute laws entails ensuring “that our laws are implemented in good faith” and using “executive discretion reasonably toward that end. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by Howard Wasserman
And I think his reading of the relevant cases is correct--and so (presumably perhaps, although you never know for sure) do a bunch of top-notch fed courts people listed in the author's footnote, including Jim Pfander, Richard Fallon, Jack Preis, Caleb Nelson, Joseph Blocher, and Abbe Gluck. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:23 pm
Burwell – A Reply to Abbe Gluck – a textual analysis of the PPACA and response to a prominent advocate for the government’s position. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
—6/15/18 An Obamacare Case So Wrong It Has Provoked a Bipartisan Outcry (w/ Abbe Gluck), New York Times, 6/19/18 Meanwhile, in a Texas Courtroom, Is the ACA in Trouble? [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 5:39 am by Abbe Gluck
Abbe Gluck and Dakota Rudesill            In this era of gridlock and difficult politics, a bipartisan group of Senators has done something worth celebrating. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
  For a good explanation of what's wrong with (2) and (3), I recommend the NY Times op-ed by Professors Jonathan Adler and Abbe Gluck. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:12 pm by Guest Blogger
., Abbe Gluck’s recent Politico piece, or her various posts at Balkinization, e.g., this one).** This is a variation on a theme Cannon recently whistled, when he asked, “What If We Applied the IRS’s Reasoning in Halbig& King to the Patriot Act or RFRA, Instead of the ACA? [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As Abbe Gluck has explained, Roberts wrote a “game-changing statutory interpretation opinion. [read post]
1 May 2013, 3:17 pm by Nate Persily
Gluck 17        Constitutional Uncertainty and the Design of Social Insurance: Reflections on the ACA Case            Michael J. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:10 am
Yet another amicus brief, on behalf of my former colleagues Professors Tom Merrill and Gillian Metzger, as well as Professors Abbe Gluck and Nicholas Bagley, made a variety of federalism arguments in the interest of constitutional avoidance. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:35 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The IRS offered no meaningful defense when it promulgated its rule — just a cursory and rather conclusory paragraph —  but several prominent academics and legal commentators offered defenses on the IRS’s behalf, including Tim Jost, Abbe Gluck, Sam Bagenstos, and Simon Lazarus. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 2:30 am by Larisa Vaysman
Although “interpretive pronouncements” are probably not binding on future panels, see Abbe R. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:34 pm by Michael Steven Green
But under the twin aims, because a New York state court deciding an unsettled question of Pennsylvania law would ignore the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s likely decision and presume that Pennsylvania law is like New York law, a federal court in New York should presume that Pennsylvania law is like New York law too. 3)      Abbe Gluck has suggested that it follows from Erie that a federal court in New York interpreting a… [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the grant for this blog; contributors to our “snap symposium” on the grant included Nicholas Bagley, Abbe Gluck, and Jonathan H. [read post]