Search for: "Abbott v. Abbott" Results 21 - 40 of 2,556
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 3:25 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Back in December, after Texas Governor Abbott signed into law an immigration enforcement law, S.B. 4, Josh Blackman and I had dueling posts (Josh's here, mine here) on whether S.B. 4 was preempted by federal law under the Supreme Court's decision in Arizona v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
” Although the terms of the Insurrection Act suggested that the militias would be federalized when civilian authorities were overwhelmed, in 1827 the Supreme Court indicated, in a case called Martin v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
Which brings us to a new piece of legislation passed by the Texas Legislature and signed into law by Governor Abbott, to be effective on March 5, 2024. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Republican politicians have embraced immigration as a potent political issue. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
  Alden Abbott—former FTC general counsel—had a recent ToTM piece called “The Porcine 2023 Merger Guidelines (The Pig Still Oinks). [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:29 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Richards) Abbott Diabetes Care Inc and others v Dexcom Inc and others [2023] EWHC 2591 (Ch) (18 Oct 2023)This was a claim by Abbot Daiabetes Care Inc and others ("Abbott") for infringement of European patent (UK)  2549918B1 for Medical device inserters and processes of inserting and using medical devices and a counterclaim by Dexcom Inc [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:32 am by Camilla Hrdy
Other pre-ChatGPT work on patents and AI that I found helpful include articles by Ryan Abbott (the "everything is obvious" concern), Liza Vertinsky (introducing "M/PHOSITA" for obviousness that takes into account machine as well as human skill in the art), Dennis Crouch (assessing patentability of AI-generated inventions through lens of corporate ownership and copyright work for hire doctrine), Keith Robinson (enablement issues… [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
The approach in [Abbott Laboratories v Canada (Minister of Health), 2009 FC 648] suggests that where an inventor can trace the origin of the divisional back to the forced divisional application it will be immune from double patenting attacks. [read post]